Negative consequences of the freedom of the press

An issue which frequently generates heated opinions is the freedom of the press. Although the freedom of the press offers people the possibility of expressing their opinions and beliefs, it cannot be denied that it may carry negative consequences, as it could be harmful for international relations, it could give biased information and it could interfere in individuals’ lives. In my opinion the press is necessary to certain degree although it produces many negative consequences.
To begin with, some people often say that the freedom of the media could be harmful for international relations. This means, that some offensive information could be given without thinking whether it causes resentment on the public. In fact, the freedom of the press does not respect other’s beliefs or opinions, causing political or religious problems between countries, as well as among people.
Secondly, it is assumed that the freedom of the media can provide biased information. Therefore, many citizens are influenced by this kind of information; that is, people who are unaware of the real situations are influenced by reporters’ thoughts and ideologies.
Thirdly, many skeptics believe that the freedom of the press may affect people’s lives. That is, the media usually interferes with people’s businesses and feelings; as a consequence individuals feel naked by the reporters’ inquiry. In fact, the media is not respectful with individuals’ privacy, as they inquire or record citizens in difficult and morbid situations with the only aim of increasing the number of spectators.
Taking these points into consideration, it could be said that the freedom of the press is necessary to a certain degree. However, those who make use of this freedom should think carefully about the information given and their consequences.